Compute 101 → ZK, minus the fluff. Zero knowledge = prove it happened without leaking the “how.” Powerful, but proving is heavier than doing so the only way this scales is serious horsepower wired into a real market. That’s where @cysic_xyz is playing.
❯ Practical shift: Cysic’s already a multi-node prover on Succinct’s SP1 (Jul 17, 2025), so rollups can route jobs to real GPUs today lower $/proof and tighter p95 when blocks get spicy.
❯ Next leg: custom silicon. The C1 zkVM-based chip (with ZK-Air & ZK-Pro devices) is their path to 10×+ proving speedups i.e., proofs moving at network speed, not deck speed.
❯ My read: verification’s cheap, proving’s the tax. If the hardware plan lands, that tax shrinks and ZK stops being a novelty and becomes default infra.
---
Dev notes I’m tracking:
❯ Bench $/proof and p95 with/without a Cysic prover on the same SP1 job.
❯ Watch ASIC release notes for power, throughput, and memory-bound bottlenecks.
❯ Keep receipts (txs, logs); weigh latency vs. reward flow as workloads spike.
Net: ZK turned “trust me” into “verify me.” ComputeFi turns that verification into an economy cycles you can point, price, and own. If you’re testing, drop your benches; I’m grading curves, not slogans.

8,610
184
本頁面內容由第三方提供。除非另有說明,OKX 不是所引用文章的作者,也不對此類材料主張任何版權。該內容僅供參考,並不代表 OKX 觀點,不作為任何形式的認可,也不應被視為投資建議或購買或出售數字資產的招攬。在使用生成式人工智能提供摘要或其他信息的情況下,此類人工智能生成的內容可能不準確或不一致。請閱讀鏈接文章,瞭解更多詳情和信息。OKX 不對第三方網站上的內容負責。包含穩定幣、NFTs 等在內的數字資產涉及較高程度的風險,其價值可能會產生較大波動。請根據自身財務狀況,仔細考慮交易或持有數字資產是否適合您。

