Most people think “XRP staking” means wrapping risk or CEX custody. What @moremarketsxyz and Firelight are actually shipping is cleaner: FXRP stays in the Flare stack, gets deployed to Firelight vaults, and you mint stXRP that can earn protocol fees when coverage is bought real demand, not vibes. Flare’s own update laid the groundwork for the XRP Earn Account, and Firelight’s Nov 2025 mainnet notes confirm stXRP + fee-based rewards as Phase 2 rolls in.
I like the design because custody and execution are separated: deposits live in the Flare/XRPL model, strategies rotate under the hood, and rewards are sourced from actual cover fees rather than temporary emissions. MoreMarkets’ also shows they’ve been wiring in institutional-style routes (Term, Aave, etc.) this adds a second income stream via Firelight’s cover market.
❯ What changes: passive XRP becomes stXRP with fee share potential
❯ Why it matters: fee revenues scale with DeFi usage, not just incentives
❯ Who benefits: self-custody users who want institutional mechanics without CEX trade-offs
Dev note: expose a simple “coverage fees earned” stat per account so power users can track fee share vs. incentives over time. Claim check: if cover uptake grows post-mainnet, the thesis holds; if it stalls, rewards tilt back toward incentives.
I’m tracking stXRP supply, fee accrual, and Flare TVL next. Also looping STBL here since they’ve been pushing for self-custody yield done right

3,825
163
本页面内容由第三方提供。除非另有说明,欧易不是所引用文章的作者,也不对此类材料主张任何版权。该内容仅供参考,并不代表欧易观点,不作为任何形式的认可,也不应被视为投资建议或购买或出售数字资产的招揽。在使用生成式人工智能提供摘要或其他信息的情况下,此类人工智能生成的内容可能不准确或不一致。请阅读链接文章,了解更多详情和信息。欧易不对第三方网站上的内容负责。包含稳定币、NFTs 等在内的数字资产涉及较高程度的风险,其价值可能会产生较大波动。请根据自身财务状况,仔细考虑交易或持有数字资产是否适合您。

