am i the only one who shorted the Uniswap fee switch here? why: • no mention of fees earned directed to buybacks, only forward fees. they cover rewarding existing holders with retroactive burn only. • adding 5bps at protocol layer changes the routing science and reduces volume • removing frontend fees which were 3x-5x the new 5bps protocol fee may not mean more revenue imo • LPs now get paid less 20-25% less as protocol fee is intro'ed. will liquidity stick around? • basically been losing market share on all chains that matter • see relative math with Jupiter as a comp where flywheel has been active im sure gauntlet and uniswap did the math though. from my perspective, 5bps feels like the highest they could go at a protocol level without getting rekt on flows/revs. else why wouldn't they have gone higher? why didn't uniswap show their homework (the math) in the governance post? FWIW i paired my UNI short with a long on JUP. awaiting threadooors and number crunchers to punt me out of the trade.
7,949
28
本页面内容由第三方提供。除非另有说明,欧易不是所引用文章的作者,也不对此类材料主张任何版权。该内容仅供参考,并不代表欧易观点,不作为任何形式的认可,也不应被视为投资建议或购买或出售数字资产的招揽。在使用生成式人工智能提供摘要或其他信息的情况下,此类人工智能生成的内容可能不准确或不一致。请阅读链接文章,了解更多详情和信息。欧易不对第三方网站上的内容负责。包含稳定币、NFTs 等在内的数字资产涉及较高程度的风险,其价值可能会产生较大波动。请根据自身财务状况,仔细考虑交易或持有数字资产是否适合您。