There has been too much debate about Kaito's new algorithm these days, and it seems that standing with Kaito puts you on the opposite side of the people, which feels a bit politically incorrect. The specific viewpoints are as follows: 1⃣ An intermediary's FDV shouldn't be in the billions. How many Web3 projects have positive returns, and how many vaporware projects have an FDV of over a billion? From the perspective that coins are coins and projects are projects, they can have no relation at all; FDV only relates to chip distribution and the manipulation by the market makers. Even if positioned as an intermediary, the small local shop downstairs and Lianjia are fundamentally different. No agency can reach the information dissemination range of Kaito. 2⃣ Why does a big influencer "GMGN+ @ XXX" make the list, while I write a lot and it’s of no use? I suspect this is a partial flaw in Kaito's current algorithm, but if you're fixated on this, you're already wrong. Why does a big influencer get thousands of dollars in sponsorship fees every month for a "fitness tweet + sponsored by XXX," while you analyze the XXX project in depth every day and earn nothing? Retail investors are very important; individuals are never important. Don't be naive and let those projects that say "we value every retail investor" fool you. Accepting that you are not important and knowing how to make yourself important is what truly matters. Kaito is just a Web3 project; if you think it’s not good, then criticize it and switch to another project. Cookie is friendly to retail investors, and I think that’s a good choice. ------------ All the above viewpoints are determined by one's position; if you think otherwise, then you must be right.