Biconomy price

🔥 TOP PROJECTS WITH THE LARGEST RANK CHANGE @streamflow_fi +90.8% @OfficialApeXdex +87.2% @Port3Network +86.2% @helium +83.7% @biconomy +83.3% @Aave +81.3% @usebraintrust +81.2% @Uniswap +80.6% @Brickken +80.2% @BSquaredNetwork +80.0% BrokerScore places projects on a relative scale where better-performing projects earn higher scores and is evaluated over 30 different metrics. Spikes in Rank Change illustrate project performance movement. $STREAM $APEX #PORT3 $HNT $BICO $AAVE $BTRST $UNI $BKN

$ETH ETF inflow of $69,100,000 🟢 yesterday. BlackRock bought $148,900,000 in Ethereum.

Lombard: Bitcoin-DeFi Infrastructure Bridge @Lombard_Finance has established itself as the leading infrastructure for converting Bitcoin liquidity into productive on-chain capital. In just 92 days since launch, it recorded a TVL of $1.526 billion and a 60% market share in the BTC LST market. The core token, $LBTC, maintains a 1:1 collateralization with Bitcoin while automatically absorbing native staking rewards from Babylon (@babylonlabs_io), making it a yield-generating asset. Users send native BTC to a designated address, and once 6 confirmations are completed on the Bitcoin chain, LBTC is minted on the target chain after consortium verification. The deposited BTC remains on the Bitcoin chain, contributing to the security of other PoS networks through Babylon, and the reward tokens are automatically converted to BTC, increasing the LBTC reserve ratio. As a result, the value of LBTC gradually appreciates against BTC without the need for reward claims or re-basing. The security of this structure is multi-layered. A security consortium consisting of 14 institutions controls issuance and redemption with a 2/3 signature on a Cosmos-based PoA chain, while CubeSigner HSM enforces multi-signature, time-lock, and withdrawal limits. Cross-chain transfers undergo dual verification by Chainlink CCIP and Bascule oracles, and in case of anomalies, the smart contract can be paused. Redemptions proceed in the order of LBTC burning → consortium confirmation → Babylon unbonding (7–9 days) followed by the return of native BTC, maintaining a stable 1:1 correspondence between the ledger and reserves. The key to differentiation is "yield + composability + multi-chain." While WBTC offers no yield and tBTC has limitations in automation and scalability, LBTC inherently accumulates approximately 1% BTC-denominated yield automatically, and when combined with Aave, Pendle, EigenLayer, etc., it opens up double-digit yield strategies. At the same time, it is natively deployed across 13+ chains, including Ethereum, Solana, Sui, Base, and Starknet, connecting liquidity across ecosystems. In fact, about 82% of the circulating LBTC is deployed in DeFi, demonstrating capital productivity beyond simple wrapping. Looking at the on-chain flow, about 96% of the reserves are conservatively managed on the Bitcoin native layer (Babylon staking), while the remainder forms DeFi liquidity on Ethereum and other chains. Liquidity accumulates in major pools such as Uniswap, Airdrodrome, Curve, and Raydium, showing sufficient depth for everyday transactions. DeFi integration has diversified into lending, yield trading, restaking, and Solana harvesting strategies, with aggressive positioning possible depending on market conditions, like Pendle's high-yield pool. Macro-wise, the structural trend of 'BTC as Yield' is favorable for Lombard. As institutional holdings increase post-ETF, the opportunity cost of holding without yield becomes apparent, leading to demand for yield-bearing BTC exposure with a regulatory-friendly verification and security framework. With BTCfi TVL rapidly expanding, Lombard has room for further expansion as a key liquidity layer for Babylon and a multi-chain hub. If regulatory clarifications and chain expansions continue, additional TVL in the billions could come into view in the medium term. Of course, risks are also evident. The biggest variable is regulation. If yield-bearing BTC tokens are interpreted as securities, KYC/AML and licensing requirements may tighten, leading to sales restrictions by jurisdiction. Typical security risks at the bridge, oracle, and smart contract layers, assumptions of honest majorities in the consortium, and potential liquidity discounts due to stress from Babylon unbonding must also be considered. The basic APY itself relies on Babylon's reward structure and demand, so the quality and sustainability of long-term yields are subjects for ongoing monitoring. Nevertheless, the execution and metrics to date suggest that Lombard offers the most comprehensive solution for "converting Bitcoin idle assets into productive capital." The stability of 1:1 collateral, automatically accumulating native yields, and the combination of institutional-grade security and multi-chain composability clearly distinguish it from WBTC (lack of yield) and tBTC (scalability and automation limits). The future battleground will be the stable expansion of Babylon's security and demand, the regulatory friendliness of yield-bearing BTC products, and the robustness of multi-chain operations, oracle, and consortium governance. If these conditions are met, Lombard is likely to maintain its standard status as a Bitcoin-DeFi bridge by 2027, and for holders seeking productive BTC exposure, LBTC will remain an attractive option relative to risk.